<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for aiosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aiosphere.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aiosphere.com</link>
	<description>architecture for Ambient Information Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ethernet solutions by timmyt</title>
		<link>http://aiosphere.com/2008/05/04/ethernet-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>timmyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiosphere.com/2008/05/04/ethernet-solutions/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>this was a great post

until i found this i was 92.4% set on a xport + xbee gateway

have you made any progress in this area

i live in the U.S, and i&#039;m concerned about the fcc part 15 certification, which mandates any commercial radio manufacturer have their product certified (i think)

i&#039;d love to find an inexpensive zigbee to ethernet gateway that&#039;s already been certified</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was a great post</p>
<p>until i found this i was 92.4% set on a xport + xbee gateway</p>
<p>have you made any progress in this area</p>
<p>i live in the U.S, and i&#8217;m concerned about the fcc part 15 certification, which mandates any commercial radio manufacturer have their product certified (i think)</p>
<p>i&#8217;d love to find an inexpensive zigbee to ethernet gateway that&#8217;s already been certified</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WiFi instead of Zigbee by Jim</title>
		<link>http://aiosphere.com/2008/03/09/wifi-instead-of-zigbee/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiosphere.com/2008/03/09/wifi-instead-of-zigbee/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>How does power consumption compare for Zigbee versus WiFi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does power consumption compare for Zigbee versus WiFi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Push vs pull? by Nitin</title>
		<link>http://aiosphere.com/2008/03/24/push-vs-pull/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiosphere.com/2008/03/24/push-vs-pull/#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

My use of IM was to get around this same problem!
You start an IM connection from the device and then leave the connection ON. When the server has a message for you it will send it to you. Folks who want to communicate with the device send it an IM and then you can do it from a PC, mobile phone or any internet connected device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>My use of IM was to get around this same problem!<br />
You start an IM connection from the device and then leave the connection ON. When the server has a message for you it will send it to you. Folks who want to communicate with the device send it an IM and then you can do it from a PC, mobile phone or any internet connected device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Address block strategies by Nitin</title>
		<link>http://aiosphere.com/2008/05/04/address-block-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aiosphere.com/2008/05/04/address-block-strategies/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

Ethernet allows for a user configurable MAC address. You could take a seed and generate MAC addresses. As long as the private address bit is set.. there is very little chance of it colliding with a commercially available Ethernet device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>Ethernet allows for a user configurable MAC address. You could take a seed and generate MAC addresses. As long as the private address bit is set.. there is very little chance of it colliding with a commercially available Ethernet device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

